MICHAEL RAVEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellant's convictions and sentences pursuant to a plea agreement are affirmed, but the case is remanded to correct the judgment to reflect the proper offense designation for Count 2.
[1] In an Anders appeal, where a judgment and sentences are affirmed on the merits, the appellate court may remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the offense descri…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Raven entered into a plea agreement and was convicted and sentenced accordingly. The judgment contained a scrivener's error in the description…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentences entered pursuant to a plea agreement. We remand,
however, for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect the offense in Count 2 as sexual battery by a person 18 years or older on a child 12 years of age or older but less than 18 years of age.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR. MAKAR, WALLIS, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________