TERESA LAMBERT
v.
MIKE ROBERTS

Fla. 1st DCA | 2024-12-11
No. 1D2024-0975
2024 FL 13781 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

When an appellate record is incomplete or inadequate, the appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues to determine whether the trial court's judgment is supported by evidence or reverse based on alleged legal error.


Headnotes

[1] An appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues or determine whether a trial court's judgment is supported by evidence when the appellate record is incomplete o…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Without an adequate record of the proceedings below, the appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues to conclude the trial court's judgment is not supported by evidence or an alternate theory.”

Court's explanation of why judgment cannot be reversed when record is inadequate

Facts & Procedural History

Teresa Lambert appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Columbia County entered by Judge Mark E. Feagle.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

December 11, 2024 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See J P Morgan Chase Bank v. Combee, 883 So. 2d 330, 331–32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“Without an adequate record of the proceedings below, the appellate court cannot properly resolve factual issues to conclude the trial court’s judgment is not supported by evidence or an alternate theory. Moreover, ‘[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial court so misconceived the law as to require reversal.’ The trial court’s decision ‘could well be supported by evidence adduced at trial [or hearing] but not stated in the judge’s order or otherwise apparent in the incomplete record on appeal.’” (quoting and citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979))).

KELSEY, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw