HATCHER, IV
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2025-01-17
No. 2D2023-1691
2025 FL 477 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An object not designed to inflict bodily harm may constitute a weapon if it was threatened to be used in a manner likely to cause bodily harm, and the question of whether an object is a weapon during commission of a felony is a question of fact for the jury.


Headnotes

[1] An object not originally designed to inflict bodily harm may constitute a weapon for felony purposes if threatened to be used in a manner likely to cause bodily harm.

[2] Whether an object is being used as a weapon during commission of a felony is a question of fact for the jury to determine.

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“An object not designed to inflict bodily harm may be a 'weapon' if it was . . . threatened to be used . . . in a manner likely to cause bodily harm.”

Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 15.1, cited by the court to support the affirmance.

Facts & Procedural History

Joseph Hatcher was convicted in Manatee County Circuit Court. The conviction involved the use or threatened use of an object as a weapon.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

January 17, 2025 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Lee E. Haworth, Judge. Blair Allen, Public Defender and Christine Trakas Thornhill, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 15.1 ("An object not designed to inflict bodily harm may be a 'weapon' if it was . . . threatened to be used . . . in a manner likely to cause bodily harm."); see also Shepard v. State, 259 So. 3d 701, 707 (Fla. 2018) (concluding that whether an object is being used as a weapon during the commission of a felony is a question of fact for the jury). KELLY, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw