JERARTIS ICON
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not err in striking a successive motion for jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(d).
[1] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(d) prohibits trial courts from considering successive motions for correction of jail credit after a criminal sentence becomes fin…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIcon filed an initial motion to clarify concurrent sentences and obtain jail credit on November 27, 2023, which was denied on December 15, 2023. Icon …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Correction Of Jail Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed October 22, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0772 Lower Tribunal No. F16-20205
________________
Jerartis Icon,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge. Jerartis Icon, in proper person. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daniel Colmenares, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Jerartis Icon appeals a March 31, 2025 order (“Order”) that strikes, as successive, Icon’s April 2, 2024 “Motion to Clarify Concurrent Sentences and Jail with Prison Credits” (“Motion”). See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801 (governing the correction of jail credit after a criminal sentence becomes final). Attached to the Order are copies of (i) Icon’s initial rule 3.801 motion, filed below on November 27, 2023, and (ii) the trial court’s December 15, 2023 order denying relief, that conclusively shows the Motion was successive. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e) (incorporating Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)(5)). Because rule 3.801(d) expressly prohibits a trial court from considering a successive motion for jail credit, the trial court did not err by entering the challenged Order striking the Motion. Affirmed.