TYRELL L. LOVE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This is an Anders appeal from a March 14, 2024 order revoking Tyrell L. Love's probation and sentencing him to forty-five months in the Department of Corrections. The trial court found Love violated condition 5 of his probation by driving with a suspended license and unlawful possession of another's identification. The appellate court affirmed the sentence and probation revocation but remanded for a corrected order reflecting only the driving violation.
The court affirmed the probation revocation and forty-five month sentence based on the single proven violation of driving with a suspended license but remanded for entry of a corrected revocation order that either deletes reference to or dismisses the unproven second violation.
[1] A probation revocation order must be corrected to reflect only those violations that were actually proven at the revocation hearing, and reference to unproven violations…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLove was charged with two violations of condition 5 of his probation: driving while his license was suspended and unlawful possession of another's per…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse New Law Violation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an Anders1 appeal from the March 14, 2024 order revoking Appellant’s, Tyrell L. Love, probation and sentencing him 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
to forty-five (45) months in the Department of Corrections with credit for 125 days time served on Count I. The affidavit asserting he violated probation identified two counts of violating condition 5: first, by driving while his license was suspended, and second, by unlawful possession of another’s personal identification.
We affirm the sentence and the trial court’s finding that he willfully violated condition 5 of the terms of his probation by committing a new law violation, namely driving a motor vehicle while his license was suspended. Appellant’s counsel argued below and the trial court orally pronounced that the State failed to prove the second violation of condition 5. However, the current order revoking probation erroneously indicates that the revocation of Appellant’s probation was based on both charged violations of condition 5. Accordingly, we remand for entry of a corrected order of revocation to reflect a willful violation of condition 5 based only on Appellant driving while his driver’s license was suspended and either deleting any reference to the second condition 5 violation or stating that it was dismissed. See Hatcher v. State, 392 So. 3d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (citing Font v. State, 299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
EDWARDS, C.J., and JAY and KILBANE, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Veltman v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)