TOWN OF BOYNTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. C. F. KNUTH, J. P. BOWEN, M. A. WEAVER, WILLIAM MENZEL AND OSCAR MAGNUSSON, INTERVENING APPELLEES
TOWN OF BOYNTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. C. F. KNUTH, J. P. BOWEN, M. A. WEAVER, WILLIAM MENZEL AND OSCAR MAGNUSSON, INTERVENING APPELLEES
100 Fla. 16
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 129 So. 112
Cited by 118 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered,ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (31 total)
-
England v. State, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006)…answering machine tape. Instead, it was offered to establish that she recognized the voice on the tape as England’s. Testimony regarding recognition of the voice of the accused is admissible as direct and positive proof of identity. Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112, 115 (1930). Therefore, the trial judge did not err, much less abuse his discretion, in admitting the testimony. Next, England asserts that the trial judge violated the best evidence rule in permitting DeLeon to testify to the contents…
-
Cornelius v. State, 49 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1950)…ant a reversal. Salter v. State, 152 Fla. 284, 10 So. 2d 809; Kelly v. State, 145 Fla. 491, 199 So. 764; McCall v. State, 113 Fla. 469, 152 So. 19; Thomas v. State, 96 Fla. 243, 118 So. 22; Fouts v. State, 101 Fla. 1248, 133 So. 81; Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112; Wallace v. State, 41 Fla. 547, 26 So. 713. In determining whether the error of which complaint is made was harmful or prejudicial, we must decide upon examination of all the evidence whether the result would have been different had th…
-
Downer v. State, 375 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1979)…s delegated authority, to promulgate restrictions upon public access to TMH in order to promote the health of their patients as well as the efficient functioning of the facility. . Harris v. State, 129 Fla. 733, 177 So. 187 (1937); Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112 (1930); Grech v. State, 243 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); accord, United States v. Sullivan, 456 F. 2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1972). But see Anderson v. State, 92 Fla. 477, 110 So. 250 (1926).…
Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence