NEXT MEDICAL FLORIDA, LLC, ETC.
v.
PEAK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's order granting a motion to transfer on forum non conveniens grounds is reviewed for abuse of discretion and will be affirmed where the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error and fails to provide a transcript.
[1] A trial court's order granting a motion to transfer based on forum non conveniens grounds is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNext Medical Florida, LLC appealed a non-final order from Miami-Dade County Court granting Peak Property and Casualty Insurance Corporation's motion t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Transfer cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Certain Underwriting Members of Lloyd’s v. Prime Holdings Ins. Servs., Inc., 306 So. 3d 1086, 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (stating that a trial court’s order granting a motion to transfer based on forum non conveniens grounds is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard); Beacon Hill Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. Colfin Ah-Fla. 7, LLC, 221 So. 3d 710, 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (providing that an appellate court reviews the denial of a motion for rehearing under an abuse of discretion standard); Migliori v. Migliori, 983 So. 2d 670, 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (explaining that when a motion to transfer is appealed without a transcript, there is “no basis to reverse the decision of the trial judge”); Gaspard v. Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“[I]n appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error[.]” (quoting Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979))).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Migliori v. Migliori, 983 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
- Certain Underwriting Members of Lloyd's v. Prime Holdings Ins. Servs., Inc., 306 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)