NATCO, LLC
v.
NATALIE H. CARL, BLAYNE CARL, AND GEORGE CARL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
NATCO, LLC appealed a temporary injunction granted in a Circuit Court case against the Carls. The appellees confessed error, and the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the injunction order, vacating the temporary injunction.
The court reversed the portion of the order granting the temporary injunction and vacated it, accepting the appellees' confession of error.
[1] A temporary injunction requires satisfaction of four elements: likelihood of irreparable harm, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, substantial likelihood of succ…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a temporary injunction can be granted only when there is a showing of (1) the likelihood of irreparable harm; (2) the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (3) substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) considerations of the public interest”
States the four-part legal standard required for granting a temporary injunction in Florida
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNATCO, LLC sought a temporary injunction against Natalie H. Carl, Blayne Carl, and George Carl in a circuit court action in Brevard County. The circui…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Interest Considerations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On confession of error by Appellees, which we accept, we reverse the portion of the order on appeal that grants a temporary injunction. E.g., Naegele Outdoor Advert. Co. v. City of Jacksonville, 659 So. 2d 1046, 1047 (Fla. 1995) (recognizing that a temporary injunction can be granted only when there is a showing of (1) the likelihood of irreparable harm; (2) the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (3) substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) considerations of the public interest).
REVERSED with instructions to VACATE the temporary injunction. EDWARDS, C.J., and EISNAUGLE and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.