JOHNSON
v.
MADDOX
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The First District Court of Appeal dismissed a pro se petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus, finding that he failed to establish a legal basis for the relief he sought.
No, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a basis for the relief requested.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus may be dismissed when the petitioner fails to demonstrate a cognizable basis for the relief sought.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The Court dismisses Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus for failure to demonstrate a basis for the relief requested.”
This quote states the court's ultimate decision and the primary reason for dismissal.
Petitioner Antonio Johnson, appearing pro se, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against David Maddox, Warden of Apalachee Correctional Instituti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus for failure to demonstrate a basis for the relief requested.
KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Antonio Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.
Dan Johnson, General Counsel, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.