TYRIEK JAKARI GANIOUS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A written sentencing order imposing costs of prosecution must be corrected on remand when it fails to conform to the oral pronouncement made at sentencing.
[1] A written sentencing order imposing costs of prosecution must be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement made by the trial court at sentencing when the two are inc…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGanious was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon. At sentencing, the trial court made an oral pronoun…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Order Conformity To Oral Pronouncement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts of firstdegree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon. Appellant raises six grounds for reversal. Only one of the six grounds merits brief discussion. Appellant argues and the State concedes the written order imposing cost of prosecution does not conform to the oral pronouncement at sentencing. We agree. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s rulings, judgments, and sentences without discussion. However, we remand the case for the ministerial correction of the written order imposing cost of prosecution to conform to the oral pronouncement at sentencing.
Affirmed with remand for ministerial correction of one order.
LEVINE, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.