ORANGE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CITY OF ORLANDO, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
ORANGE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
THE CITY OF ORLANDO, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
156 So. 2d 912
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Budagail S. Kirchman v. Kirchman, 389 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…used in combination to provide for the needy spouse after dissolution. Lee v. Lee, 309 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Alimony is not to be used to pay off a debt from one spouse to another. Spears v. Spears, 148 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA), aff’d mem., 156 So. 2d 912 (Fla.App. 1963). See also Black v. Black, 247 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Here, the trial judge referred to his award as “periodic alimony” in the transcript and denominated it merely “alimony” in the judgment. We do not know if he means periodi…