TREASURE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

WHITE STAR REALTY CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Emmett Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …rsible error, Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Lawler, Fla.App., 151 So. 2d 852, reh. den. (1963). Furthermore, the charge given must be not only erroneous but “reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead” the jury, Clearwater v. McClury, Fla.App., 157 So. 2d 545 (1963) and thus reasonably be harmful, Stiles v. Calvetto, Fla.App., 137 So. 2d 17 (1962); Owca v. Zemzicki, Fla.App., 137 So. 2d 876 (1962). The court’s charge, we conclude, did not do so in this case. For the foregoing reasons we agree there is n…
• State v. Rejrat, 540 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …ranting this petition, we are not foreclosing the trial court’s authority to grant a new trial or other appropriate post-trial relief. Under appropriate circumstances, inadequate instructions may authorize a new trial. City of Clearwater v. McClury, 157 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); but see Schaffer v. Pulido, 492 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (party who submitted jury instruction and verdict form could not request new trial on invited error). The possibility of an addittur also exists in this case. § 768.7…
• Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Morgan, 190 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
  …[*795] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: Bailey v. Lloyd, Fla. 1952, 62 So. 2d 56; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 669; Archibald v. Wittmer, Fla. App.1960, 120 So. 2d 236; City of Clearwater v. McClury, Fla.App.1963, 157 So. 2d 545; Maynard v. Sullivan, Fla.App.1964, 168 So. 2d 75; Danek v. Hoffman, Fla.App. 1966, 189 So. 2d 893 (opinion filed September 16, 1966).…

Authorities Cited

• Powers v. Scobie, 60 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1952)
• Robinson v. Feltus, 68 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1953)
• Cartish v. Soper, 157 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)