WILLIAM E. BAKER, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1963-11-22
No. 32358
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
157 So. 2d 811 Florida Supreme Court (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This matter recurs for consideration upon the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. Pursuant to the directions of that Court it is now found that the petition, if proved, alleged grounds for post-conviction relief. In order to expedite the disposition of the matter we decline to issue a writ of habeas corpus, but expressly without prejudice to the petitioner to proceed under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.E.2d 799, and on remand, Gideon v. Wainwright, (Fla.) 153 So.2d 299, opinion filed May 15, 1963.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McMASTER v. Purdy, 274 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Higginbotham v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 769; Hillhouse v. State, Fla.1963, 159 So. 2d 228; Hohenstein v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 158 So. 2d 527; Ivey v. State, Fla.1963, 157 So. 2d 811.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw