MRS. KATE NICHOLSON, A RESIDENT AND CITIZEN OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
AIMEE A. CHASE AND DWIGHT B. CHASE, NON-RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLEES
MRS. KATE NICHOLSON, A RESIDENT AND CITIZEN OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
AIMEE A. CHASE AND DWIGHT B. CHASE, NON-RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLEES
100 Fla. 44
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Caution
Also reported at: 129 So. 501
Cited by 91 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be,' and the same is hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (28 total)
-
Palm Beach Ests. v. Bula E. Croker, 106 Fla. 617 (Fla. 1932)…dings when he has had full opportunity to amend and perfect them before appealing from an interlocutory order made with reference thereto. An interlocutory appeal in equity in this State is but a step in the cause.* Robinowitz v. Houk, 100 Fla. 41, 129 Sou. Rep. 501; Section 4635 C. G. L., Chapter 11890 Acts of 1927. And upon any appeal, whether interlocutory or final, this Court has authority to' enter its own decree here disposing of the matter brought before it for review. McLin v. Florida Automobile Owners…
-
Thursby v. Stewart, 103 Fla. 990 (Fla. 1931)…pellants and appellee. Stovall vs. Stovall, 77 Fla. 116, 80 So. 744. The defendant's, who voluntarily appealed, had the right to join their co-defendants, who were also affected by the order, as parties appellant. (Rabinowitz vs. Houk,.... Fla...., 129 So. 501, Hay vs. Isletts, 98 Fla. 1026, 125 So. 237; Guaranty T. & T. Co. vs. Thompson, 89 Fla. 35, 103 So. 110.) It is a general rule that when an appeal is perfected, [*1012] the cause becomes one for the cognizance of the appellate court, and for that c…
-
Minick v. Minick, 111 Fla. 469 (Fla. 1933)…bject to mere' irregularities therein, but the final decree must be proper and such as the complainant is entitled to take on his bill. Clarkson v. Louderback, 36 Fla. 660, 19 So. 887; Hart v. Stribling, 21 Fla. 136; Rabinowitz v. Houk, 100 Fla. 44, 129 So. 501. It is also a general rule that where all the allegations of a bill upon which relief is predicated áre admitted, no proof is necessary to sustain the bill. However, divorce proceedings constitute an exception to this latter rule. . Even where there…
Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence