EDWARD WILLIAM ANDERSON, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
An original petition for writ of habeas corpus is presented by this petitioner on numerous grounds. Insofar as petitioner contests the constitutionality vel non of the procedures allegedly employed in the execution of the indeterminate sentence imposed against him, the petition should be denied. F.S. Section 921.18-921.23, F.S.A.; Carnley v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 118 So.2d 629. To the extent, however, that the petition is predicated upon issues cognizable by motion under Rule 1, Florida Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, we do not reach its merits because the remedies provided by the Rule are not shown to have been exhausted.
Writ denied.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, TJ-, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pope v. State, 458 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…d the act, but not the offense charged. We are intrigued by this technical conundrum, apparently raised for the first time on appeal in order to salvage the trial court’s decision, Savage v. State, 156 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. denied, 158 So. 2d 518 (Fla.1963), but conclude that we need not plumb its depths as we find from a careful study of the record that the “unknown intruder” defense was never fully developed during trial. Instead, defense counsel relied primarily on the presumption of inno…
-
Genet v. City OF Hollywood, 400 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…to Section 95.361, Florida Statutes (1977). Nonetheless, utilizing the maxim that we should uphold the trial court if its judgment is sustainable under any theory supported by the record, Savage v. State, 156 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA) cert. denied, 158 So. 2d 518 (Fla.1963), I would affirm the judgment of the trial court subject to the qualification set forth below. I believe the trial record contains abundant evidence to support a finding of implied common law dedication. See Hollywood, Jnc. v. City of Holl…
-
Amrep Corp. v. Nicholson, 249 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)…ests upon a valid basis, an appellate court will not disturb that judgment merely because it is founded upon erroneous grounds. Escarra v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 131 So. 2d 483 (Fla.1961); Savage v. State, 156 So. 2d 566 (Fla.App.1963), cert. den. 158 So. 2d 518. In the case at bar, there is a valid reason that supports the judgment being reviewed so as to make it unnecessary to decide the questions posed by appellant. That reason is not dependent upon any facts which may be in controversy. It will be recal…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carnley v. Cochran, 118 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1960)