SHELMARK LAND CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCISCO ZAYAS AND CARMELINA V. DEZAYAS, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Shelmark Land Corporation appealed an amended summary judgment awarding damages, costs, and attorneys' fees for unpaid mechanic's lien obligations incurred before the property sale. The court affirmed the damages and costs but reversed the award of attorneys' fees for lack of legal basis.
The court affirmed the summary judgment awarding damages and court costs, as the defendant failed to file a verified answer denying the allegations in the verified complaint. However, the court reversed the award of attorneys' fees, finding no legal basis for such recovery under the pleadings.
“The defendant failed to respond to plaintiffs' verified complaint by filing a verified answer or other statement under oath denying the allegations contained in the complaint. Therefore, we can not say that the trial judge erred in granting the amended summary judgment as to damages and court costs.”
Establishes the basis for affirming summary judgment—the defendant's failure to file a verified response admitted the factual allegations.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiffs purchased an improved parcel of land from defendants and received a warranty deed and mechanic's lien affidavit. Prior to the sale, lightin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Verified Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
The defendant appeals from an amended summary final judgment awarding damages, court costs, and attorneys’ fees to the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs had purchased an improved parcel of land from the defendants and had received a warranty deed and a mechanic’s lien affidavit covering the property. This suit was instituted to recover from the defendant certain monies paid by the plaintiffs to satisfy an unpaid bill for lighting fixtures installed on the property prior to its sale to the plaintiffs. The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs were forced to pay the bill in order to prevent the removal of the fixtures under a writ of replevin. Recovery was sought under the warranty deed and the mechanic’s lien affidavit.
The record before us consists of a verified complaint, a motion to dismiss and an order denying same, an unverified answer, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The trial judge found that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. A partial summary judgment was entered as to the defendant’s liability. The parties waived a jury trial as to damages and, after hearing, an amended summary final judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $694.00, plus court costs of $51.90 and reasonable attorneys’ fees of $150.00.
That portion of the amended summary final judgment relating to damages and costs is affirmed. The defendant failed to respond to plaintiffs’ verified complaint by filing a verified answer or other statement under oath denying the allegations contained in the complaint. Therefore, we can not say that the trial judge erred in granting the amended summary judgment as to damages and court costs.1
As to the award of attorneys’ fees, we find no basis for allowing such a recovery under the pleadings in this case. See: Re Field’s Estate, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 46; Thibert v. Thibert, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 918. That portion of the amended summary judgment is accordingly reversed.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Herring v. Wilber T. Eiland, 81 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1955)
- MacGregor v. Hosack, 58 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1952)
- Gen. Truck Sales, Inc. v. Am. Fire & Cas. Co., 100 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
- Matter of the Estate of T. S. Field, 121 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
- Thibert v. Thibert, 106 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
- Moore v. McCANN Plumbing Co., 139 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)