C. C. BUSH, ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS BALL GROUND MONUMENT CO.,
v.
CARY BROWN, GUSSIE SCHOFIELD, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Supreme Court affirmed a decree in favor of heirs challenging a sheriff's sale of real estate belonging to a decedent's estate. The court held that an administrator who purchased monuments without legal authority and allowed a default judgment against the estate had no right to encumber the estate's real property, and the heirs were entitled to relief.
The court held that the administrator had no right, title, or interest in the lands involved because the purchase of monuments was unauthorized by law and created no legal obligation against the estate. The allegations in the bill of complaint were sufficient to warrant relief, and the doctrine of caveat emptor applies to the purchaser at the sheriff's sale.
“It is shown that A. C. Brown as Administrator, the judgment debtor, had no right, title or interest in the lands involved.”
Establishes that the administrator lacked authority to encumber the estate's real property with the unauthorized debt.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJ. J. Brown died intestate, leaving real estate and sufficient personal property to pay debts. The administrator, A. C. Brown (also an heir), purchase…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intestate Succession cases and more on FLexlaw
The appeal brings for review an order overruling and denying motion to dismiss amended bill of complaint and also final decree in favor of complainants.
The allegations of the amended bill of complaint show that one J. J. Brown died intestate. That the complainants and the defendant, A. C. Brown, were his sole hairs at law. That he left sufficient personal property to pay all his debts and obligations. That he left certain described real estate which was never an asset in the hands of the Administrator, *184A. C. Brown. That A. C. Brown was a member of a co-partnership from which he purchased certain monuments or slabs as the Administrator of the Estate of J. J. Brown, deceased. That he did not pay for the monuments or slabs and the co-partnership filed suit against him as such Administrator. That he was served with process and allowed judgment to be taken by default. That a pretended levy was made on the real estate of which J. J. Brown died siezed and possessed and a sheriff’s sale made thereof without any of the complaining heirs having been made parties and without any order of the Probate Court or of any court of. competent jurisdiction, authorizing the Administrator to take charge of the real estate or any part thereof for the purpose of paying the debts of the deceased.
It is alleged that the purchase of the slabs or monuments by the Administrator was not authorized by law and was without legal authority and created no legal obligation against the estate of J. J. Brown, deceased.
The allegations were entirely sufficient to warrant the relief prayed. It is shown that A. C. Brown as Administrator, the judgment debtor, had no right, title or interest in the lands involved.
The doctrine of caveat emptor applies to the purchaser at the sheriff’s sale. Higgins v. Driggs, 21 Fla. 103; Gracy v. Fielding, 71 Fla. 1, 70 Sou. 625.
The complainants were not guilty of laches which would preclude the maintenance of the suit.
The order and decree appealed from are without error and should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur.
*185Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gracy v. Fielding, 71 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1916)
- Higgins v. Driggs, 21 Fla. 103 (Fla. 1884)