JUNE WITLIN, APPELLANT,

v.

MORRIS M. WITLIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, 168 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1964)
  …ari of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, affirming, without opinion, an order of the Circuit Court denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Young Spring & Wire Corporation v. Smith, Fla.App.1963, 159 So. 2d 120. Petitioner asserts that a direct conflict exists between the instant case and Fawcett Publications, Inc., v. Brown, Fla.App. 1962, 146 So. 2d 899. Probable jurisdiction having been made-to appear on the theory of “direct conflict,”' the cause was…
• Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, 172 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …led interlocutory appeal was decided by this Court in December 1963, when we affirmed without opinion an order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, Fla.App.1964, 159 So. 2d 120. The cause is before us now after the Supreme Court in the course of considering petition for certiorari, relinquished jurisdiction temporarily with the request that we reconsider the cause and render an opinion setting forth the basis and reasoning…
• Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, 176 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 1965)
  …ERVIN, Justice. In this case a petition for writ of certi-orari was filed seeking our review of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District (Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, Fla.App.1964, 159 So. 2d 120). The decision sought to be reviewed is an order of affirmance without opinion. Petitioner, Young Spring & Wire Corp., a Michigan corporation, was the defendant in the trial court upon whom substituted service was held to have been duly and legally…

Authorities Cited

• Witlin v. Witlin, 153 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)