HOME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., AND ROY J. DEEB AND MARILYN K. DEEB, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
RUDOLPH BURSANI AND LILLIAN BURSANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
HOME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., AND ROY J. DEEB AND MARILYN K. DEEB, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
RUDOLPH BURSANI AND LILLIAN BURSANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
159 So. 2d 244
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal brings for review a final decree based upon findings of fact and *245recommendations of a Special Master. In view of the presumption of validity which attaches and with no showing of abuse of discretion or other error, the decree is
Affirmed.
KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and McMULLEN, NEIL C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Home Dev. Co. OF ST. Petersburg, Inc. v. Bursani, 178 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1965)…ROBERTS, Justice. The cause is again before the court on conflict certiorari, to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, 159 So. 2d 244, 176 So. 2d 100, which had affirmed a decree of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County. This court, feeling that probable jurisdiction had been made to appear, set the cause for oral argument on the questions of jurisdiction and merits. Follo…
-
Home Dev. Co. OF ST. Petersburg, Inc. v. Bursani, 176 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…PER CURIAM. This court by its opinion in the above cause, reported Fla.App.1963, 159 So. 2d 244, affirmed the final decree of the chancellor in the following words: “This appeal brings for review a final decree based upon findings of fact and recommendations of a Special Master. In view of the presumption of validity which attaches and with n…