STEPHEN SULTENFUSS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. CHARLES MCMULLING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WAYNE SNOW, JR., JAMES T. MORRIS, MOBLEY HOWELL, MICHAEL H. WING, BETTYE O. HUTCHINGS, MICHAEL J. BOWERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
STEPHEN SULTENFUSS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. CHARLES MCMULLING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
WAYNE SNOW, JR., JAMES T. MORRIS, MOBLEY HOWELL, MICHAEL H. WING, BETTYE O. HUTCHINGS, MICHAEL J. BOWERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
14 F.3d 572
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1994)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
(Panel Opinion November 3, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F. 3d 1543)
Feb. 4, 1994.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en bane, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sultenfuss v. Snow, 35 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)…ersing the district court’s grant of summary judgment, a panel of this court held that the current parole system does create a protected liberty interest. Sultenfuss v. Snow, 7 F. 3d 1543, 1449-50 (11th Cir.1993), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 14 F. 3d 572 (11th Cir.1994). The panel concluded that “the mandatory language of the statute and the Guidelines, combined -with the particularized standards that guide the Board’s parole determinations, create a liberty interest in parole release in Georgia.”…1 / 2
-
Bradley v. Pryor, 305 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 2002)…ircuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur dubitante. If a district court’s decision is correct for any reason, then it is due to be affirmed, even though the particular reason given by the district court is erroneous. See Hempel v. United States, 14 F. 3d 572, 576 (11th Cir.1994); Collins v. Seaboard Coastline R.R. Co., 681 F. 2d 1333, 1335 (11th Cir.1982). I am inclined to affirm the judgment based upon my conclusion, tentative though it be, that under the circumstances presented here the petitioner d…
-
Begner v. United States, 428 F.3d 998 (11th Cir. 2005)…to reread the contract to reflect, an unexpressed term permitting their deduction of previous Collateral Agreement payments because a term cannot be read into a contract where there is no indication that it should be there. Hempel v. United States, 14 F. 3d 572, 578 (11th Cir.1994) (refusing to rewrite a taxpayer’s contract with the IRS). III. For the reasons stated above, this Court concludes that the district court did not err in granting the IRS’s motion for summary judgment. AFFIRMED. . Although Al…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sultenfuss v. Snow, 7 F.3d 1543 (11th Cir. 1993)