FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER, PETITIONER,
v.
CLARENCE BROWN, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, AN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed a judgment on the pleadings, finding that an insurer breached its contract by failing to defend its insured in a lawsuit arising from an accident and by refusing to satisfy the resulting judgment.
The court held that the trial court erred in entering judgment on the pleadings, as the insurer breached its insurance contract by failing to defend and satisfy the judgment against the insured.
The appellant, insured by the appellee, was sued for damages after an automobile accident while driving a non-owned vehicle. The appellee refused to d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permanent Partial Disability Rating cases and more on FLexlaw
The claimant, Clarence Brown, was injured by accident in his employment on May 18, 1959. The employer, self-insured, provided medical care and temporary total compensation until February 14, 1960, at which time compensation was terminated. The claimant secured the services of his attorneys who filed a claim on his behalf on February 15, 1960. Subsequently compensation and medical care were reinstated. Temporary total compensation was paid up to August 10, 1961, at which time the claimant was rated as having 15 per cent. permanent partial disability. The claimant contended that he had more than 15 per cent, permanent partial disability. A hearing was held before the Deputy Commissioner on April 12, 1962, and the claimant was awarded compensation in an amount representing 40 per cent, permanent partial disability of the body as a whole. The order which also fixed a fee for the services of claimant’s attorneys was affirmed by the full commission.
The employer, on petition for cer-tiorari, first urges that the Deputy Commissioner departed from the essential requirements of the law in finding that the claimant sustained a 40 per cent, permanent disability of the body as a whole. The Deputy Commissioner is free to choose between conflicting testimony. The disability rating awarded is supported by competent substantial evidence which accords with logic and reason. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 741.
The employer’s second objection is that the Deputy Commissioner erred in fixing the amount of the fee of claimant’s attorneys. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner the parties through counsel stipulated that a reasonable fee may be awarded the attorneys for the claimant without the necessity of taking evidence on this issue. The employer may not question the attorneys’ fee upon the ground that the claimant failed to present such evidence. The record fails to establish that the Deputy Commissioner departed from the essential requirements of the law in fixing the amount of the attorneys’ fee.
For the reasons above expressed we decline to disturb the order of the full commission and the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.
THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (retired), JJ., concur.