M.R. TAFFET AND ROBERT M. FIERMAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OF THE PERSONS, CORPORATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, AND OTHER ENTITIES, OTHER THAN THE DEFENDANTS, WHO ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SOUTHERN CO., SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC., ALABAMA POWER COMPANY AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. FREDERICK RODGERS CARR, CARR SALES COMPANY, O.E.M. PRODUCTS, INC., TIMOTHY DUNN STOKELY, III AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. THE SOUTHERN COMPANY, SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC., GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
M.R. TAFFET AND ROBERT M. FIERMAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OF THE PERSONS, CORPORATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, AND OTHER ENTITIES, OTHER THAN THE DEFENDANTS, WHO ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
THE SOUTHERN CO., SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC., ALABAMA POWER COMPANY AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. FREDERICK RODGERS CARR, CARR SALES COMPANY, O.E.M. PRODUCTS, INC., TIMOTHY DUNN STOKELY, III AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. THE SOUTHERN COMPANY, SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC., GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
958 F.2d 1514
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
M.R. Taffet and Robert M. Fierman v. The S. Co., 967 F.2d 1483 (11th Cir. 1992)…ted appeal to this court, a divided panel reversed; the majority rejected each of the doctrines relied upon by the district courts as a basis for dismissal of the cases at hand. Taffet v. Southern Co., 930 F. 2d 847, 851-57 (11th Cir.1991), vacated, 958 F. 2d 1514 (11th Cir.1992) (per curiam). The dissent argued that the filed rate doctrine and the primary jurisdiction doctrine foreclose application of RICO to a public utility after a rate has been approved by a state rate-making body; thus, the appellants’…1 / 3
-
MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Best Tel. Co., Inc., 898 F. Supp. 868 (S.D. Fla. 1994)…o cause of action for fraud. Taffet v. Southern Co., 967 F.2d 1483 (en banc) (11th Cir.1992) (“Taffet II”). In Taffet v. Southern Co., 930 F.2d 847 (11th Cir.1991), vacated, rehearing en banc granted, Taffet v. Southern Co., 958 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied Taffet v. Southern Co., — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 657, 121 L.Ed.2d 583 (“Taffet I”), the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant utilities fraudulently understated their income in regulatory agency filings to justif…