LINDA L. HARRELL, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, AND AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF LARRY GENE HARRELL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DECATUR COUNTY, GA., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
PER CURIAM: Our previous panel opinion reported at 22 F. 3d 1570 (11th Cir.1994) is hereby VACATED. After rehearing this case, which included the consideration of supplemental briefs and additional oral argument, we now affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in all respects. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina’s dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F. 3d at 1577-81, and this court’s recent decision in Lassiter v. Alar bama A & M University, 28 F. 3d 1146 (1994) (en banc), which the panel did not have the benefit of at the time we released our opinion in Harrell. AFFIRMED. . In an order filed with the clerk on August 29, 1994, the panel granted the defendants' petition for rehearing.
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with this court’s decision to affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the question of qualified immunity for Deputy Morris in his individual capacity for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina’s dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F. 3d at 1577-80 and this court’s recent decision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F. 3d 1146 (11th Cir.1994) (en bane).
I write separately to emphasize that we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment with respect to the claims against Deputy Morris in his official capacity, Sheriff Phillips in his individual and official capacities, Decatur County, and the Decatur County Commissioners because of our determination that Harrell was not deprived of any constitutional rights for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina’s dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F. 3d at 1580-81.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McGORY v. Metcalf, 665 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…hael was not looking at Karl at that moment. By Michael’s own admission, all Michael could see was Karl’s back because Karl was twenty yards in front of him and silhouetted by the flashlight McGory was shining on Karl. Cf. Harrell v. Decatur County, 41 F. 3d 1494 (1995), which, on rehearing, adopted the dissenting opinion of Judge Dubina in Harrell, 22 F. 3d 1570, 1577-81 (11th Cir.1994). In Harrell on rehearing the court found that an eyewitness’s version of the encounter between the police officer and th…
-
Morello v. Russell, 667 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…[*417] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Elder v. Holloway, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1019, 127 L.Ed.2d 344 (1994); Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Harrell v. Decatur County, Georgia, 41 F. 3d 1494 (11th Cir.1995); Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 7 F. 3d 1552 (11th Cir.1993), modified, 14 F. 3d 583 (11th Cir.1994); Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff’s Dept., 962 F. 2d 1563 (11th Cir.1992), approved en banc, 998 F. 2d 923 (11th Cir.1993); City…
-
Montoute v. Carr, 114 F.3d 181 (11th Cir. 1997)…Montoute as he approached the officers. Under the circumstances, Carr is no less entitled to qualified immunity because he shot Montoute later instead of sooner. Our decision in this case is consistent with the holding in Harrell v. Decatur County, 41 F. 3d 1494 (11th Cir.1995) vacating and adopting dissent in 22 F. 3d 1570 (11th Cir.1994). In that case, we upheld qualified immunity where a law enforcement officer shot and killed a felony suspect, because the officer reasonably could have believed the sus…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lassiter v. Ala. A & M Univ., 28 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Harrell v. Decatur Cnty., 22 F.3d 1570 (11th Cir. 1994)