UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ERNEST MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ERNEST MARSHALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
976 F.2d 658
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F. 2d 1302 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F. 2d 51, 53 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F. 2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F. 2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F. 2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F. 2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1990). We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal. AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hall, 996 F.2d 284 (11th Cir. 1993)…y was otherwise extensive. Accordingly, the Appellant’s sentence is AFFIRMED. . We note that Appellant’s argument, that he should not have been counted in the calculation, is foreclosed by this Court’s recent decision in United States v. Marshall, 976 F. 2d 658, 658 (11th Cir.1992) ("We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity.”), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1657, 123 L.Ed.2d 276 (1993).…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456 (10th Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494 (5th Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179 (4th Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d 51 (8th Cir. 1992)
- United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1992)