ROBERT DEWEY GLOCK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

HARRY K. SINGLETARY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Lukehart v. State, 776 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2000)
  …ourt’s conclusion is supported by the evidence, and that under the totality of the circumstances, Luke-hart’s statements were obtained in a manner compatible with the requirements of the United States and Florida Constitutions. Stano v. Butterworth, 51 F. 3d 942, 944 (11th Cir.1995). In the second subissue within this claim, Lukehart argues that the trial court erred in admitting his statements into evidence because, although he had invoked his right to counsel very early on the evening of February 25 by s…
• Stano v. State, 708 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1998)
  …hearing over a fifteen-day period, the district court issued a twenty-eight-page order which included detailed factual findings and denied Stano habeas relief.5 On appeal, the circuit court affirmed the district court’s ruling. Stand v. Butterworth, 51 F. 3d 942 (11th Cir.1995).6 The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on February 20, 1996. Stano v. Singletary, 516 U.S. 1122, 116 S.Ct. 932, 133 L.Ed.2d 859 (1996). [*274] The Governor signed Stano’s third death warrant. Execution was scheduled for…
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Joe's Stone Crab, Inc., 220 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2000)
  …)). In this case, where the bulk of the evidence came in the form of conflicting witness testimony, we allot even greater deference to the factfinder who is in a better position to assess the credibility of the witnesses. See Stano v. Butterworth, 51 F. 3d 942, 944 (11th Cir.1995) (citing Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 575, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1512, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985)). That said, we have struggled on appeal to find the proper resolution of this case. As we explain in detail, we believe…