OSWALDO JARAMILLO, PETITIONER,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AND THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Medlock, 12 F.3d 185 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …federal sentencing proceedings the constitutional validity of prior convictions when such convictions are offered by the government for sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Our decision is controlled by United States v. Roman, 989 F. 2d 1117 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. July 29, 1993) (No. 93-5464). Roman involved a defendant’s challenge at sentencing to the constitutional validity of an earlier state court conviction forming the basis for sentence enhance…
• United States v. Lawrence, 47 F.3d 1559 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …es facilitate the court’s factfinding function. The court begins by reviewing the PSR, which serves a role similar to a pretrial stipulation in a civil case by identifying factual and legal issues that remain in dispute. See United States v. Roman, 989 F. 2d 1117, 1122 n. 11 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc) (Tjoflat, C.J., concurring), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2139, 128 L.Ed.2d 868 (1994); United States v. Wise, 881 F. 2d 970, 972 (11th Cir.1989). When a defendant challenges one of the factual bases of h…
• United States v. Spell, 44 F.3d 936 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …ument is permitted under the Guidelines. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment, (n. 2). But despite the Guidelines’ approach, the ability to “look behind” state convictions in a federal sentencing proceeding is very limited. See, e.g. United States v. Roman, 989 F. 2d 1117, 1120 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2139, 128 L.Ed.2d 868 (1994). As the Supreme Court explained in Taylor v. United States, the practical difficulties of holding mini-trials on a defendant’s prior convictions counsel…