THE CONE CORPORATION; J.W. CONNER & SONS; BULGER CONTRACTING CO.; BOYCE COMPANY; S & E CONTRACTORS, INC.; WOODRUFF & SONS, INC.; SUNCOAST UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CONE CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; DALLAS 1 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; FREDERICK B. KARL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
THE CONE CORPORATION; J.W. CONNER & SONS; BULGER CONTRACTING CO.; BOYCE COMPANY; S & E CONTRACTORS, INC.; WOODRUFF & SONS, INC.; SUNCOAST UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CONE CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; DALLAS 1 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; FREDERICK B. KARL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
993 F.2d 784
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on plaintiffs-appellants’ suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en bane. The previous panel’s opinion 983 F. 2d 197, is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. State, 636 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…'Unlike this case, the parties in Suarez agreed that the new federal act covered digital display pagers used in that case. 906 F. 2d at 980 n. 7. . Based on the record, Jackson’s display pager fits this description. . In United States v. Herring, 993 F. 2d 784 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 347, 126 L.Ed.2d 312 (1993), the court construed the definition of electronic communication broadly to include the interception of satellite pay-per-view television programming. . These substantive…
-
United States v. Biro, 143 F.3d 1421 (11th Cir. 1998)…n devices is “surreptitious.” In discussing the question whether a device that was modified by the appellants to decipher scrambled satellite television signals fell within the plain meaning of § 2512, this court stated in United States v. Herring, 993 F. 2d 784 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc): Although the term “surreptitious” is not defined in the statute itself, its dictionary definition is well established: secret and unauthorized; clandestine; action by stealth or secretly. It is clear that this device oper…
-
The Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough Cnty., 5 F.3d 1397 (11th Cir. 1993)…acksonville — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2297, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 (1993), this court, sitting en banc, has asked us to reconsider our original opinion in this case, Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 983 F. 2d 197 (11th Cir.), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 993 F. 2d 784 (11th Cir.1993). The en banc opinion is published at Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 995 F. 2d 185 (11th Cir.1993) (per curiam). The Northeastern Fla. Court, addressing an affirmative action set-aside program for contractors’ services, indica…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough Cnty., 983 F.2d 197 (11th Cir. 1993)