AUGUST URBANEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. White, 335 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …offense of illegally being in the United States. Applying this standard, “[w]e will not find clear error unless our review of the record leaves us ‘with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ” Coggin v. Commissioner, 71 F. 3d 855, 860 (11th Cir.1996) (quoting United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948)). Nevertheless, that high standard is met in this case. At White’s sentencing hearing, the district judge briefly discussed his re…
• United States v. Poirier, 321 F.3d 1024 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …clear error, United States v. Cain, 881 F. 2d 980, 982 (11th Cir.1989), and “[w]e will not find clear error unless our review of the record leaves us ‘with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,’” Coggin v. Commissioner, 71 F. 3d 855, 860 (11th Cir.1996) (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 542, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948)). That high standard is met in this case. The record clearly establishes that both defendants obstructed justice. The…
• U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. S. Tr. Metals, Inc., 894 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2018)
  …uated under the clear-error standard. HGI , 427 F. 3d at 873. "We will not find clear error unless our review of the record leaves us 'with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.' " Coggin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue , 71 F. 3d 855, 860 (11th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Gypsum Co. , 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948) ). Finally, when the district court has issued a permanent injunction, we review the scope of the injunction under the abuse-of-discre…

Authorities Cited

• Urbanek v. United States, 866 F. Supp. 1414 (S.D. Fla. 1994)