WILBURN DOBBS,
v.
A.G. THOMAS, WARDEN, GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER

11th Cir. | 1996-01-19
No. 95-8244
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
74 F.3d 239 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: This case is remanded to the district court, and the district court is directed to conduct de novo hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of counsel in the sentencing phase of this case. Following hearings, the district court shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law. REMANDED.'

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wilburn Dobbs v. Turpin, 142 F.3d 1383 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …CV-247-HLM (N.D.Ga. July 29, 1994). This court again reversed and remanded, directing the district court “to conduct de novo hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of counsel in the sentencing phase of this case.” Dobbs v. Thomas, 74 F. 3d 239 (11th Cir.1996). This court further instructed the district court to “make written findings of fact and conclusions of law” at the conclusion of the hearings. Dobbs, 74 F. 3d at 239. On remand, the district court conducted evidentiary hearings on…
  • ASX Inv. Corp. v. Newton, 183 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 1999)
    …tion heading is "By Order of Court.” Although we recognize that headings may not be used to limit the plain meaning of a statute or rule and generally are used as interpretive tools only when the text is ambiguous, Raven v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 74 F. 3d 239, 243 (11th Cir.1996), we note in this case the headings bolster our plain reading of the rule. .Appellees point out that some claims such as class actions and derivative suits cannot be dismissed without court approval or order. They argue that unde…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw