ROBIN JOY SHAHAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL J. BOWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
ROBIN JOY SHAHAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
MICHAEL J. BOWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
78 F.3d 499
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
(Opinion December 20, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 70 F. 3d 1218) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shahar v. Bowers, 114 F.3d 1097 (11th Cir. 1997)…n of educational process, ensuring that teachers perform their duties without distraction, and avoiding potential liability for accidents were strong enough to justify the burden.” Shahar v. Bowers, 70 F. 3d 1218, 1231 n. 11 (11th Cir.1995), vacated 78 F. 3d 499 (1996). See also id. at 1231 ("A survey of intimate association cases (and analogous privacy cases) in the context of employment reveals that courts, irrespective of the doctrinal test being applied, have consistently balanced the interest of the…
Authorities Cited
- Shahar v. Bowers, 70 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 1995)