PETER J. GRILLI, SPECIAL MASTER, JULIO GONZALEZ-ROEL, ET AL.; RONALD COULTER; ANISSA COULTER, APPELLANTS, SHERRY HORTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., RICK URSO, DEFENDANTS, W. R. CUNNINGHAM, ET AL., CLAIMANTS

11th Cir. | 1996-07-31
Nos. 94-3328 and 94-3468 to 94-3470
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and RONEY and CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judges.
92 F.3d 1074 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT: Appellees’ motion to clarify opinion .is GRANTED. This court’s opinion is hereby clarified by inserting the following sentence between the second and-third sentences of the last paragraph of the opinion: “These attorney’s fees and double costs shall be paid by the appellants. Their liability for such fees and double costs shall be joint and several.” The opinion shall remain otherwise unchanged.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Patti, 337 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …lea of guilty without the consent of the trial judge.”). With respect to the writ of mandamus, Patti concedes that a defendant can challenge a denial by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Circuit, see Wyatt ex rel. Rawlins v. Rogers, 92 F. 3d 1074, 1081 & n. 17 (11th Cir. 1996), but asserts that writs are issued only in exceptional circumstances, see In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig., 614 F. 2d 958, 961-62 (5th Cir. 1980). . Although Patti asserts that the district court should hav…
  • Reynolds v. G.M. Roberts, 207 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2000)
    …f moves the court to issue an order to show cause why the defendant should not be adjudged in civil contempt and sanctioned. See Newman, 683 F. 2d at 1318; see also Thomason v. Russell Corp., 132 F. 3d 632, 634 n. 4 (11th Cir.1998); Wyatt v. Rogers, 92 F. 3d 1074, 1078 n. 8 (11th Cir.1996). The plaintiffs motion cites the injunctive provision at issue and alleges that the defendant has refused to obey its mandate. See Wyatt, 92 F. 3d at 1078 n. 8. If satisfied that the plaintiffs motion states a case of n…
  • Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp., 138 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …abused its discretion in failing to certify that one class. . Class certification orders are also not among the sorts of interlocutory orders over which the courts of appeals have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). See Wyatt v. Rogers, 92 F. 3d 1074, 1081 (11th Cir.1996). Class certification decisions may be reviewed under section 1292(a) only when they are integral to a district court’s decision regarding an injunctive order, review of which is authorized by section 1292(a). See Plekowski,…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw