JANE ROE, II, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT BUTTERWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

11th Cir. | 1997-11-24
No. 97-4427
Before COX and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and FAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
129 F.3d 1221 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: This suit and appeal involve a challenge to the laws of the state of Florida prohibiting prostitution. The contentions are that such laws violate several provisions of and rights recognized under the United States Constitution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its thorough opinion published at 958 F.Supp. 1569 (S.D.Fla.1997). AFFIRMED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Haddaway v. State, 891 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …on of prostitution, which was deleted in 1986 when the Legislature extensively revised section 796.07. This section, as revised, does not prohibit consenting adults from engaging in sex. See Roe v. Butterworth, 958 F.Supp. 1569 (S.D.Fla.), affirmed, 129 F. 3d 1221 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1024, 118 S.Ct. 1309, 140 L.Ed.2d 473 (1998). [*633] The state argues, on appeal, that it presented sufficient evidence to permit the jury to infer money changed hands because Haddaway’s conduct was consistent…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw