CLARENCE E. HILL, OF HIMSELF AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND HARRY K. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
CLARENCE E. HILL, OF HIMSELF AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND HARRY K. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
147 F.3d 1333
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Petition for Rehearing. HATCHETT, Chief Judge: In light of Calderon v. Ashmus, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1694, 140 L.Ed.2d 970 (1998), we grant Florida’s petition for rehearing, vacate our previous opinion, Hill v. Butterworth, 133 F. 3d 783 (11th Cir.1997), reverse the judgment of the district court, and remand the case with instructions to dissolve the injunction and dismiss the complaint for want of a justiciable case or controversy. See Hill, 133 F. 3d at 785 n. 7 (Florida raised this issue on appeal). REVERSED and REMANDED. Florida's motion to stay is denied as moot.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kelley v. Sec'y FOR THE Dep't OF Corr., 377 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2004)…of state factual determinations as bearing on a right to federal relief, and the presumption of correctness to be given such state determination. Id. . We addressed this issue once in Hill v. Butterworth, 133 F. 3d 783 (11th Cir.1997), vacated by 147 F. 3d 1333, 1334 (11th Cir.1998). The district court in that case determined that Florida did not satisfy all of the requirements necessary to invoke chapter 154. Id. at 784-85 (quoting Hill v. Butterworth, 170 F.R.D. 509, 524 (N.D.Fla.1997)). Noting that,…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740 (U.S. 1998)
- Hill v. Butterworth, 133 F.3d 783 (11th Cir. 1997)