SHARI L. LYES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, CINTHIA BECTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Apolinar Martinez-Mendoza v. Champion Int'l Corp., 340 F.3d 1200 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …it “suffers or permits” the individual to work. See 29 U.S.C. § 203(g); 29 U.S.C. § 1802(5). “An entity ‘suffers or permits’ an individual to work if, as a matter of economic reality, the individual is dependent on the entity.” Charles v. Burton, 169 F. 3d 1322, 1328 (11th Cir.1999) (citation omitted). Since joint employment relationships — -where a single individual stands in the relation of an employee to two or more persons at the same time — are common in agriculture, see 29 C.F.R. § 500.20(h)(5), bot…
• Eloy Renteria-Marin v. Ag-Mart Produce, Inc., 537 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2008)
  …and not the physical facility could not directly effectuate the maintenance of, inter alia, plumbing, electricity, sanitation, fire safety equipment and cleanliness in compliance with applicable federal and state standards. Cf. Charles v. Burton, 169 F. 3d 1322, 1333 (11th Cir.1999) (“[A] business that owns or controls the work-site will likely be able to prevent labor law violations, even if it delegates hiring and supervisory responsibilities to labor contractors.”). Moreover, if a person is to comply w…
• Leandre Layton v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., 686 F.3d 1172 (11th Cir. 2012)
  …r relationship existed. See id. In 1997, the Department of Labor amended the AWPA regulations to further clarify the definition of joint employment under the AWPA. Following the amendments, we were confronted with AWPA claims in Charles v. Burton, 169 F. 3d 1322 (11th Cir.1999) (per curiam), and we adapted the eight-factor test laid out in Aimable to reflect the new guidance offered by the regulations. See, e.g., 169 F. 3d at 1332 (“[T]he Aimable court found that an analysis of this factor fails to aid in…

Authorities Cited

• Lyes v. City OF Riviera Beach, 166 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1999)