J. M. MCCORMICK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1964-02-21
No. 4011
SHANNON, Acting C. J., KANNER, J., (Ret.), and FARRINGTON, OTIS, Associate Judge, concur.
161 So. 2d 48 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed a conviction for issuing a worthless check, finding no errors in the trial proceedings. The defendant was represented by the public defender at trial and on appeal.


Holding

No errors were committed during the trial, and the jury's verdict is supported by the evidence presented.


Key Quotes

“We have carefully considered the record in the cause and arrive at the view that no error was committed through the course of the trial, and that there is no reason to overturn the verdict of the jury.”

This quote establishes the court's finding that the trial was free of error and the jury's verdict was sound.

Facts & Procedural History

The appellant was convicted of obtaining $65.00 in cash by knowingly issuing a worthless check on an account with insufficient funds. He was represent…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of obtaining property, to wit, $65.00 in cash in return for a worthless check knowingly issued on an account without sufficient funds. He was represented throughout the trial proceedings by the public defender. The appeal is brought from the judgment of conviction and sentence. He has been capably represented on this appeal through briefs and oral argument by the public defender who represented him at the trial. The defendant did not testify nor was there any witness that testified on his behalf.

*49We have carefully considered the record in the cause and arrive at the view that no error was committed through the course of the trial, and that there is no reason to overturn the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., KANNER, J., (Ret.), and FARRINGTON, OTIS, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw