JERRY J. KILPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
SAMUEL H. HOUSTON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
JERRY J. KILPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
SAMUEL H. HOUSTON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
197 F.3d 1134
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus, which is published at 36 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (N.D.Fla.1999). AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230 (U.S. 2001)…r prior decisions invalidating the 1995 rule, have concluded that § 3621(e)(2)(B) permits no categorical exclusions of nonviolent offenders based on sentence enhancements. Ward v. Booker, 202 F. 3d 1249, 1256-1257 (CA10 2000); Kilpatrick v. Houston, 197 F. 3d 1134, 1135 (CA11 1999). The Ninth Circuit, on the other hand, has agreed with the Eighth Circuit that precedent invalidating the 1995 rule does not control and that, in 1997, the BOP permissibly exercised its discretion under § 3621(e)(2)(B) when it cate…
Authorities Cited
- Kilpatrick v. Houston, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (N.D. Fla. 1999)