ROSARIO DONATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Mancinelli v. Davis, 217 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
  …with his or her corporate principal or employer.” Richard Bertram, Inc. v. Sterling Bank & Trust, 820 So. 2d 963, 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (quoting Lipsig v. [*1037] Ramlawi, 760 So. 2d 170, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)); McAndrew v. Lockheed Marlin Corp., 206 F. 3d 1031, 1036 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc). “This doctrine stems from basic agency principles that ‘attribute the acts of agents of a corporation to the corporation, so that all of their acts are considered to be those of a single legal actor.’ ” Dickerson v.…
• Grider v. City OF Auburn, 618 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2010)
  …ly, “[t]he intracorporate conspiracy doc trine holds that acts of corporate agents are attributed to the corporation itself, thereby negating the multiplicity of actors necessary for the formation of a conspiracy.” McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 206 F. 3d 1031, 1036 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc). “[U]nder the doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with its employees, and its employees, when acting in the scope of their employment, cannot conspire among themselves.” Id.; accord Denney v. City of Albany, 247 F…
• Dewayne Denney v. The City OF Albany, 247 F.3d 1172 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …r the formation of a conspiracy. Simply put, under the doctrine, a corporation cannot conspire with its employees, and its employees, when acting in the scope of their employment, cannot conspire among themselves.” McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 206 F. 3d 1031, 1036 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc). The doctrine applies to public entities such as the City and its personnel. See Dickerson v. Alachua County Comm’n, 200 F. 3d 761, 768 (11th Cir.2000) (rejecting employee’s § 1985(3) claim on that basis where emplo…