NED L. SIEGEL, GEORGETTE SOSA DOUGLAS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THERESA LEPORE, CHARLES E. BURTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 2000-11-17
No. 00-15981
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
234 F.3d 1162 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT: Appellants’ Emergency Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set out in the order entered today in No. 00-15985, Touchston v. Mcdermott, 234 F. 3d 1161.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rodriguez v. Ridge, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (S.D. Fla. 2004)
    …age the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts v. Consorcio Barr, 320 F.3d 1205, (11th Cir.2003), Siegel v. Lepore, 234 F.3d 1162, 1163 (11th Cir.2000), McDonald’s Corp. v. Robertson, 147 F.3d 1301, 1306 (11th Cir.1998). Moreover, the 11th Circuit has stated that “a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy not to be granted unless the movant clearly…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw