VALLA E. WALKER, APPELLANT,

v.

CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY IN SARASOTA, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Martinez v. State, 368 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1978)
  …e reviewed the informations in this case and find that they are sufficient to inform the appellant of the nature of the offenses charged, Drozewski v. State, 84 So. 2d 329 (Fla.1955); Gray v. State, 58 Fla. 54, 50 So. 538 (1909); and Blair v. State, 161 So. 2d 233 (Fla.3d DCA 1964), and do not mislead or embarrass her in the preparation of her defense nor subject her to double jeopardy. Appellant’s third point raises a more difficult question. Can a defendant who pleads nolo contendere reserve for appeal a t…
• State v. Barnett, 339 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
  …ed criminal conspiracy affecting two or more counties. Since proof of a multicounty connection is not an essential element of the crime it was not necessary for the indictment to contain allegations of the multicounty connection. See Blair v. State, 161 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). Appellee argues that unless the state is required to allege or prove a multicounty connection he cannot discover whether the statewide grand jury’s investigation was within the scope of its jurisdiction. In fact that avenue of a…
• Patterson v. State, 167 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …Farrior v. State, Fla.1954, 76 So. 2d 148, 151; Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 412; on the authority of which we conclude the judgment appealed from should be and it hereby is reversed. Reversed. . Compare Blair v. State, Fla.App.1984, 161 So. 2d 233, where this court, in affirming a manslaughter conviction under § 860.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., held that proof of the propulsion power of an automobile as specified in that statute was not necessary hut could be inferred by a jury as a matter of common…

Authorities Cited

• Abarca v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
• Smith v. Vincent, 204 F.2d 945 (5th Cir. 1953)