RICHARD L. ASHVILLE, APPELLANT,

v.

SUPER CONCRETE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND JOEL WAYNE CROSBY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Ins. Co. OF N. Am. v. AVIS Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 348 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 1977)
  …The question of Spitzer’s personal liability, or that of her insurer, has not been raised before us. In Hertz, the driver-employee’s insurance company paid its full policy amount to Hertz as indemnification. . See Morse Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Lewis, 161 So. 2d 235 (Fla.3d DCA 1964). . At least one of the three dissenting justices considered the procedural difference between Roth and Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. Leonard, 112 So. 2d 832 (Fla.1959), to be a bar to the Court’s authority to review the di…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• NAT Harrison Assocs., Inc. v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 162 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …gligence and to pay the principal for said insurance. It would appear inconsistent that the contractor would be required to both secure insurance and be liable under a general indemnification covenant. See: Morse Auto Rentals v. Lewis, Fla.App.1964, 161 So. 2d 235. Therefore, for the reasons above expressed finding that the partial summary judgment was improperly entered, the final judgment is hereby reversed with directions to the trial court, upon remand, to enter a final summary judgment in favor of the a…
• Roth v. OLD Republic Ins. Co. & N. River Ins. Co., 269 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1972)
  …allocated as premium. Further [*6] more, Old Republic Insurance Company would not have had any right of indemnity from Plax, as an insured protected by its policy, even though he was the tort-feasor. Morse Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Lewis, Fla.App.1964, 161 So. 2d 235. We conclude Roth, as Plax’s permittee, was similarly protected by the Old Republic policy due to legal principles implicit in Susco, as we will hereinafter explain. The relevant provision in the Old Republic Insurance policy reads in part as follo…

  ← 1 / 2 →