LARRY HOPE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MARK PELZER, SERGEANT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II, GENE MCCLARAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

11th Cir. | 2002-09-13
No. 00-12150
Before TJOFLAT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and VINING , District Judge.
304 F.3d 1331 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (2002) Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM: On 27 June 2002, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed this panel’s opinion in Hope v. Pelzer, 240 F. 3d 975 (11th Cir.2001). See Hope v. Pelzer, 534 U.S. 1120, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we reverse the district court’s grant of the defendant prison guards’ motion for summary judgment and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • RDC Golf OF Fla. I, Inc. v. Apostolicas, 925 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …ce of bias or partiality is not enough to set aside an arbitration award.” RDC contends that the standard established in Lifecare conflicts with the more recent Eleventh Circuit case of University Commons-Urbana Ltd. v. Universal Constructors, Inc., 304 F. 3d 1331, 1339 (11th Cir.2002), as well as Florida law set forth in Weinger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 620 So. 2d 1298, 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). A. Florida Law Section 682.13(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that a “court shall vacate an a…
  • B.L. Harbert Int'l, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co., 441 F.3d 905 (11th Cir. 2006)
    …n the Montes case. 128 F. 3d at 1461. It remains the only case in which we have ever found the exceptional circumstances that satisfy the exacting requirements of this exception. See, e.g., Univ. Commons-Urbana, Ltd. v. Universal Constructors, Inc., 304 F. 3d 1331, 1338 (11th Cir.2002) (“[W]e have no indication of the arbitrators’ reasons for [their award], and thus, we have no reason to believe that they disregarded the law in doing it”); Broum v. ITT Consumer Fin. Corp., 211 F. 3d 1217, 1223 (11th Cir.2000)…
  • Peebles v. Merrill Lynch, 431 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2005)
    …ignore the applicable law. “Consequently, ‘there must be some showing in the record, other than the result obtained, that the arbitrators knew the law and expressly disregarded it.’ ” University Commons-Urbana, Ltd., v. Universal Constructors Inc., 304 F. 3d 1331, 1337 (11th Cir.2002) (quoting O.R. Sec., Inc. v. Profl Planning Assocs., Inc., 857 F. 2d 742, 747 (11th Cir.1988)). We find no error in the district court’s determination that there was no evidence to suggest that the arbitration panel deliberatel…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw