JOHNNY LEE HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an inmate's pro se motion requesting a full record of his trial proceedings for an appeal. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's denial of the motion, finding that the appellant was only entitled to the record pertaining to his collateral attack, which had already been provided.
No, the appellant is only entitled to the transcript of proceedings relating to the collateral attack made pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule Number One.
“The object of the subject motion appears to be to have the clerk and court reporter of the trial court prepare and forward for use on this appeal a complete record of all of the proceedings on the trial of the cause.”
Describes the appellant's request that was denied by the lower court.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJohnny Lee Harris, an inmate, filed a motion in the trial court requesting a complete record of his trial proceedings. This motion was treated as an a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Transcript Of Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
Johnny Lee Harris, an inmate of the Florida State Prison at Raiford, Florida, in proper person filed with the Clerk of the Court of Record in and for Escambia County, Florida, a pleading entitled “Motion For Service Of Parts Of Minutes And Proceedings With Held” and said pleading has been transmitted to this court because it is captioned “In The Court Of Appeal, First District Appeal Court Of Florida” and under the style of Johnny Lee Harris, appellant, versus State of Florida, appellee.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion pursuant to Criminal Rule Number One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, to vacate a judgment of conviction and sentence for crime imposed upon appellant by the Court of Record of Escambia County, Florida.
The object of the subject motion appears to be to have the clerk and court reporter of the trial court prepare and forward for use on this appeal a complete record of all of the proceedings on the trial of the cause. The appellant is entitled only to a transcript of the proceedings relating to the collateral attack made by him pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule Number One and an in*886spection of the record filed in this court indicates that all of the proper record pertaining to the collateral attack has been duly lodged in this court. The motion is therefore without merit and should be denied.
It is so ordered.
STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cassoday v. State, 237 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1970)…Fla.Cr.Pr.R., 33 F.S. A., he would be entitled to have the State furnish a transcript of only that portion of the trial proceeding to which his motion was directed or concerned in the event he seeks an appeal from an adverse ruling. Harris v. State, 161 So. 2d 885 (Fla.App.1st, 1964); Hall v. State, 165 So. 2d 428 (Fla.App.1st, 1964); Gilliard v. State, 171 So. 2d 902 (Fla.App.2d, 1965); Conyers v. State, 200 So. 2d 821 (Fla.App.1st, 1967). The petitioner does not allege that the trial transcript is pertinen…
-
Gilliard v. State, 171 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…On petitioner’s directions to the clerk tlie State was put to considerable expense to send up the entire transcript of testimony much of which was not material to this appeal. This was a palpable abuse of privilege. In Harris v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So. 2d 885, the First District properly held: “ * * * q^e appellant is entitled only to a transcript of the proceedings relating to the collateral attack made by him pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule Number One * * (Emphasis added.) Affirmed. SMITH, C. J…
-
Conyers v. State, 200 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)…is not entitled to [*823] a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, hut “is entitled, of course, to be furnished with a transcript of all proceedings pertinent to the collateral attack under the rule * * To the same effect see Harris v. State, 161 So. 2d 885 (Fla.D.C.A.1st, 1964) and Gilliard v. State, 171 So. 2d 902 (Fla.D.C.A. 2d, 1965). In view of this rule we think that in the case at bar it would be appropriate for the Commissioner to make findings and recommendations in his report to this court as…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence