FRANCIS KNOWLTON, PETITIONER,
v.
BOCA RATON CLUB, INC., AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
FRANCIS KNOWLTON, PETITIONER,
BOCA RATON CLUB, INC., AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
162 So. 2d 262
Florida Supreme Court (1964)
Caution
Cited by 42 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 19, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
State v. Youngblood, 217 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1968)…of counsel. The mere fact of total deprivation of counsel is presumptively prejudicial. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), and on remand Gideon v. Wainwright, 153 So. 2d 299 (Fla.1963). See also, Harris v. State, 162 So. 2d 262 (Fla.1964), where we discussed the deprivation of counsel impact reflected by Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U. S. 52, 82 S.Ct. 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114 (1961), and White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59, 83 S.Ct. 1050, 10 L.Ed.2d 193 (1963). The matter of joint or sep…
-
Montgomery v. State, 176 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1965)…ate, 70 Fla. 250, 70 So. 24; Stoutamire v. State, 1938, 133 Fla. 757, 183 So. 316; Louette v. State, 1943, 152 Fla. 495, 12 So. 2d 168; Leach v. State, Fla.1961, 132 So. 2d 329; Young v. State, Fla.1962, 140 So. 2d 97; and Harris v. State, Fla.1964, 162 So. 2d 262 (reversed on other grounds). The federal rule respecting the impact on the admissibility of an extra-judicial confession of an unreasonable delay in presenting one suspected of a crime to a committing magistrate — the so-called McNabb-Mallory rule,…1 / 3
-
Barton v. State, 193 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…efore a committing magistrate during the first day of incarceration in Pinellas County was not fatal to the confession’s admission in evidence, even though the accused was subjected to questioning during the afternoon and night. See Harris v. State, 162 So. 2d 262 (Fla.1964). [*624] The appellant was taken before the committing magistrate on Monday, March 29th. In the meantime, on Friday, March 26th, the public defender was appointed by the court to represent the appellant. The delay from Friday until Monday…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence