IN RE: OPINION OF THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court advises the Governor that while he has constitutional authority to appoint Official Court Reporters under existing statutes, he has no constitutional duty to do so, and may appoint multiple reporters per circuit provided the total statewide number does not exceed the originally authorized twenty-eight.
The Governor has no constitutional duty to appoint Official Court Reporters, but retains the statutory authority under the 1927 law to appoint up to twenty-eight reporters statewide. He may appoint more than one reporter for the Twelfth Circuit if necessary, provided the total statewide does not exceed twenty-eight and at least one is allocated per court.
“An office implies a delegation of a portion of the sovereign power to, and the possession of it by, the person selected to fill the office, while an employment created in the nature of an official appointment by the Governor, does not comprehend any delegation of the State's sovereign authority to the contemplated appointee.”
Establishes the distinction between true offices (which require sovereign delegation) and mere employment, which determines whether constitutional duty to appoint applies
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Governor requested an advisory opinion regarding his duty to appoint two Official Court Reporters for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit. The presiding …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
*730In the Supreme Court of Florida
Tallahassee, Fla., August 7, 1935
Hon. David Sholtz,
Governor of Florida.
The Capitol.
Sir:
On July 26, 1935, the Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida received from your Excellency a written communication reading as follows:
“State of Florida Executive Department Tallahassee
“July 26th, 1935.
“To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Florida.
“Gentlemen:
“Pursuant to Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of Florida, I have the honor to request your opinion upon the following matter:
• “Chapter 5122, Laws of 1903, as amended by Chapter 11976, Laws of 1927, creates the state office of Official Court Reporter and in the words following provides when and how an official is to be appointed to fill that office,- to-wit:
“ ‘Section 1. There shall be, whenever the presiding Judge or Judges shall deem it necessary in any judicial circuit in this State, an Official Court Reporter of testimony and proceedings' in trials at law in the circuits. Such reporter shall be an efficient reporter, experienced in reporting judicial proceedings and shall be appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Circuit Judge or Judges of the circuit, * * * ’
“Pursuant to this law the presiding Judges of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit have deemed it necessary and have so cer*731tified to me and have recommended that I appoint two offficial Court Reporters in the Twelfth Circuit, to insure the attendance of an efficient reporter, experienced in reporting judicial proceedings', who shall at all times be subject to the call and orders of the Judge presiding over terms of court in said circuit, and it appearing by law that the two judges are required to hold terms simultaneously,
“Then, the law being as it is, and the Judges having certified that they deem it necessary and that they recommend the appointment of two reporters in said circuit, is it my duty under Section 27 of Article III of the Constitution to appoint two suitable efficient reporters experienced in reporting judicial proceedings to the office of Official Court Reporter? And am I not required by Section 6 of Article IV of the Constitution to perform this executive duty?
“Respectfully submitted,
“(Signed) David Sholtz, “ds/nj Governor.”
■ In response to the foregoing official letter and the request therein contained, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court, acting under and in obedience to Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of Florida, herewith submit .to your Excellency their opinion in writing upon the stated questions affecting your Executive powers and duties under the Constitution of Florida, as follows:
The powers and duties of the Governor to make appointments to fill vacancies in office as authorized by Section 7 of Article IV of the Constitution, depend upon the existence of a vacant office required to be filled pursuant to the Constitution, or set up by a valid statute creating the office and leaving to the Governor the duty of filling it by his own appointee in the absence of some other mode of selection of the occupant provided for by the Constitution, or *732by the Laws of the State of Florida, for filling vacancies in such office.
An office implies a delegation of a portion of the sovereign ■ power to, and the possession' of it by, ■ the person selected to fill the office, while an employment created in the nature of an official appointment by the Governor, does, not comprehend any delegation of the State’s sovereign authority to the contemplated appointee.
As no part of the sovereign poorer of the State is delegated to the official court reporters authorized by Sections 4872-4880 C. G. L. (Chapter 11976, Acts 1927; 15720, Acts 1931, Extra Session; 15859, Acts 1933) to be appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Court Judge or Judges of the several Circuit Courts of the State, whenever the presiding judge or judges shall deem it necessary in any Judicial. Court in the State, such Official Court Reporters are not state officers, but are officially employed court functionaries, whom the statute authorizes to be commissioned by the Governor to be paid at state expense in accordance with the provisions of the authorizing statutes, and when and as officially recommended by the Judge or Judges of a Circuit Court requiring, the services of an official court reporter. See: State, ex rel. Holloway, v. Sheats, 78 Fla. 583, 83 Sou. Rep. 508.
At the time Chapter 11976, Acts 1927, was enacted the State of Florida was divided into twenty-eight circuits. The legal effect and meaning of the statute at the time of its enactment, was to confer authority upon the Governor, when acting upon the recommendation of the Circuit Judges, to comply on behalf of the State of Florida, to be paid in part by the State of Florida, out of its General Revenue Fund, as many as twenty-eight official court reporters, one *733to be appointed under the existing circumstances to each then existing judicial Circuit of the State of Florida.
Said Chapter 11976, Acts 1927, is still in full force and effect. It was neither abrogated, amended nor modified by the mere ratification of the Constitutional Amendment (Section 45 of Article V, State Constitution) providing for a reapportionment of, and a reduction in the number of judicial Courts in the State to not exceeding fifteen. Nor was the Court Reporters Act amended, modified or repealed by the mere enactment at the 1935 Session of the Legislature, of Senate Bill No. 4 (Chapter 17085, Acts of 1925) providing for a reapportionment and reduction in the number of judicial courts in the State pursuant to the' Constitutional amendment above cited.
It follows from what has been said, therefore, that no constitutional duty devolves upon you as Chief Executive to make any official appointments of Official Court Reporters, under any provision of the State Constitution. But the power and authority originally created by Chapter 11976, Acts 1927, remains vested in you as Governor and authorizes you to employ or to continue in employment, and incidentally to apportion to the several judicial courts of the State, in such manner as you may deem necessary in the public interest, not exceeding a total number of twenty-eight official court reporters as originally authorized by Chapter 11976, Acts 1927 — the compensation thereof to remain payable as hereinbefore provided for by law as it existed prior to the reapportionment and reduction in the total number of judicial circuits from twenty-eight to not exceeding fifteen.'
The foregoing executive prerogative comprehends the right of the Governor to appoint, if necessary, more than one official court reporter for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, *734provided the total number employed in the state at large remains limited' to not exceeding the originally authorized twenty-eight official court reporters in all, and provided that at least one Official Court Reporter for each court be taken into consideration and allowance made therefor in the reapportionment of Official Court Reporters to adjust the same to the new system of Fifteen Judicial Circuits.
Respectfully sumbitted,
J. B. Whitfield,
Glenn Terrell,
Rivers Buford,
Fred H. Davis,
Justices.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gray v. Farris Bryant, 125 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1960)…ot apply * * The wording of the section makes it clear that it is a catchall provision which applies only when “no mode” for filling vacancies is provided elsewhere in the constitution and laws of the state. See In re Opinion of the Justices, 1935, 120 Fla. 729, 163 So. 76; State ex rel. Landis v. Bird, 1935, 120 Fla. 780, 163 So. 248, 253, and Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 1944, 154 Fla. 822, 19 So. 2d 198. In other cases we have held that Section 7, Article IV, applies only as modified by the provis…
-
Glendinning v. Curry, 153 Fla. 398 (Fla. 1943)…y prescribed independent authority of a governmental nature. State v. Sheats, 78 Fla. 583, 83 So. 508; Dade County v. State, 95 Fla 465, 116 So. 72. Thus, we have held that “official court reporters” are not “officers.” Advisory Opinion to Governor, 120 Fla. 729, 163 So. 76. Somewhat the same principles [*407] apply in municipal affairs. We have recently held that a parking meter collector and repairman in the Department of Public Safety of the City of Miami was not an officer, but an employee. See the well…
-
Robbin v. Gray Brewer, 236 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…al court reporter might be. In In re Advisory Opinion to The Governor, 1934, 114 Fla. 520, 154 So. 154, the Supreme Court apparently determined that a court reporter was “an officer.” However, in a later case, in In re Opinion of the Justices, 1935, 120 Fla. 729, 163 So. 76, the Supreme Court did an about face and spoke about official court reporters as not being state officers, but as being officially employed court functionaries. The inconsistency of the status of an official court reporter is most eviden…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The State of Fla. ex rel. v. Sheats, 78 Fla. 583 (Fla. 1919)