IRVING GREENBLATT, PETITIONER,
v.
VICTOR ADDING MACHINE CO. ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1964-04-15
No. 33244
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
163 So. 2d 759 Florida Supreme Court (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26,1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hembree v. Reaves, 266 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
    …and conclude that it states a cause of action as a matter of law. Appellants’ motion to dismiss was properly denied, and the order appealed is affirmed. SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur. . Fletcher v. Williams (Fla.App.1963) 163 So. 2d 759; Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc. (Fla.1956) 89 So. 2d 482.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw