JOHN C. ANDREWS, D/B/A JOHN C. ANDREWS ROOFING & TILE CO., APPELLANT,
v.
BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-05-12
No. 63-731
Before HORTON, TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
164 So. 2d 827 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964) Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Bromer v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 542; Bennett v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York, Fla.App. 1961, 132 So.2d 788; Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. G. & L. Roofing Co., Fla.App. 1960, 123 So.2d 300; Christ v. Progressive Fire Insurance Co., Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 821.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Peaslee v. Michalski, 167 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co., 57 Fla. 118, 49 So. 501. Cf. Conner v. Wagner, Fla.App.1961, 135 So. 2d 441; Greene v. Trash Hauling Co., Inc., Fla.App.1963, 154 So. 2d 726; Dodson v. Crews, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 252; Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 827. The foregoing cases clearly show that an appropriate and regular way to conclude a case nonsuited is to procure the entry of a final judgment from which judgment an appeal may be taken “as a matter of right,” Section 5(3) of Article V of the Const…
  • Thoman v. Timmothy Ashley, 170 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …l Corp., 1935, 118 Fla. 258, 264, 159 So. 39, 41, wherein the distinctions are defined. . Rule 1.35 is discussed later in this opinion. . E.g. Florida East Coast Railroad Co. v. Smith, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 233; Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 827; Florida East Coast Railroad Co. v. Jones, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 842, Second District opinion filed 26 August 1964; Ramsey v. Aronson, Fla.App.1958, 99 So. 2d 643; State ex rel. Larkin v. Bird, 1941, 145 Fla. 477, 199 So. 758; cf. Craft v. Clarem…
  • Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1965)
    …Court of Appeal, Third District. On Motion of Fratus as appellee, the District Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the order permitting the non-suit was non-final and therefore not subject to review by appeal. Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App., 164 So. 2d 827. It is claimed here "that the cited decision conflicts with the decision of the Court of Appeal, First District, in Dobson v. Crews, 164 So. 2d 252. There is no conflict. Here there was no final judgment. In Dobson, there was a final judgment. Hence…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw