ALVE, INC.

v.

SAUNDERS

Citator

Cited By

• Arnold v. Keither L. Shumpert, 217 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 1968)
  …the county and its insurer had waived their rights to plead immunity from the suit in defense.” The trial judge ruled that the estoppel rationale in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Palm Beach County, 157 So. 2d 820 (Fla.2d Dist.Ct.App.1963), cert. denied, 165 So. 2d 176 (Fla.1964), could be extended to apply against the County since in his view the insurance company was the real party in interest. He then held that in order to show such an estoppel the appellants must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that t…
• State v. Salvadore Saiez, 489 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1986)
  …nom. Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Department of Citrus, 456 U.S. 1002, 102 S.Ct. 2288, 73 L.Ed.2d 1297 (1982); State ex rel. Walters v. Blackburn, 104 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1958); Conner v. Sullivan, 160 So. 2d 120, 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. denied, [*1128] 165 So. 2d 176 (Fla.1964). See generally W. LaFave and A. Scott, Handbook on Criminal Law § 20, at 136-137 (1972). Moreover, in addition to the requirement that a statute’s purpose be for the general welfare, the guarantee of due process requires that the means s…
• Ins. Co. OF the State OF Pa. v. Puritan Ins. Co., 532 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …sumed the obligation. The obligation of a primary insurer is contractual in nature and is here preemptive over the secondary excess carrier’s obligation. See Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Palm Beach County, 157 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 165 So. 2d 176 (Fla.1964). Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

• Alve, Inc. v. Saunders, 156 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)