NICHOLAS JOHN ROMPON, APPELLANT,
v.
LILA MARY ROMPON, APPELLEE
NICHOLAS JOHN ROMPON, APPELLANT,
LILA MARY ROMPON, APPELLEE
165 So. 2d 251
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
The decree appealed is affirmed and appel-lee is awarded One Hundred Fifty ($150.-00) Dollars attorneys fees, money judgment for which is to be entered by the lower court
In passing we wish to note that the various judges of the lower court appear to have exercised patience and indulgence with the appellant, who ill-advisedly from time to time has elected to represent himself in this legal matter, when although he is professionally trained, such training evidently has not been for the legal profession.
Affirmed.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Matthews v. Olive M. Matthews & Soft Water Laundry, Inc., 177 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)…e of another.” Embrey v. Southern Gas & Electric Corp., Fla.1953, 63 So. 2d 258, 263; and Chapin v. Mitchell, 1902, 44 Fla. 225, 233, 32 So. 875, 878. This broad meaning has consistently been applied in this state, Stebnow v. Goss, Fla.App. 2, 1964, 165 So. 2d 251; Broward Nat’l Bank v. Bear, Fla.App. 2, 1961, 125 So. 2d 760, 84 A.L.R.2d 1352; and Embrey v. Southern Gas & Electric Corp., supra, except in the area of personal injury cases involving automobile accidents, Farley v. Collins, Fla.1962, 146 So. 2d…
-
SUN Bank/Miami, N.A. v. Saewitz, 579 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $100,000. Sun Bank first argues that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing the check payable to the plaintiff’s mother to be introduced into evidence and cites to Stebnow v. Goss, 165 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). In Stebnow, the Second District held that cancelled checks drawn by the plaintiff to the order of the decedent, which bore no inscription or other evidence indicating the purpose for which they were given, were insufficient to es…
-
Rutledge v. Rutledge, 357 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)…ppellant cites authority for the proposition that testimony of an interested witness concerning the nonpayment of an obligation of or to a deceased person constitutes a “transaction” within the meaning of the Dead Man’s Statute. See Stebnow v. Goss, 165 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Broward National Bank of Ft. Lauderdale v. Bear, 125 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961). As we see it, it is unnecessary to reach the question of whether the appellee’s testimony was barred by the Dead Man’s Statute because the final…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rompon v. Rompon, 162 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)