HUDSON & SMITH GUESTIER
HUDSON & SMITH GUESTIER
7 Cranch 1
Supreme Court of the United States (1812)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 249 · 1812 U.S. LEXIS 361 · SCDB 1812-001
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
By the court,
that the case could not he re-heard after-the term in which it had been decided.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1914)
-
Tyler v. Magwire, 17 Wall. 253 (U.S. 1872)
-
Gilmore v. United States (two cases), 131 F.2d 873 (8th Cir. 1942)…iding otherwise, the general principle obtains that a court cannot set aside or alter its final judgment after the expiration of the term at which it was entered, unless the proceeding for that purpose was begun during that term. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 249; Cameron v. McRoberts, 3 Wheat. 591, 4 L.Ed. 467; Ex parte Sibbald, 12 Pet. 488, 492, 9 L.Ed. 1167, 1169; Bank of United States v. Moss, 6 How. 31, 38, 12 L.Ed. [*875] 331, 334; Bronson v. Schulten, 104 U.S. 410, 415-417, 26 L.Ed. 797,…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence