THE UNITED STATES
v.
JONAH CROSBY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The United States sued to recover possession of land in Maine that it claimed through a title derived from an unsealed instrument executed in Grenada according to that colony's laws, but which did not comply with Massachusetts requirements for conveying real estate. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' judgment for the defendant, holding that the validity and transfer of title to real property is governed by the law of the place where the land is situated (lex rei sitae), rather than the law of the place where the contract was made (lex loci contractus).
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
THIS case is fully stated in the following opinión,of this Court, which was delivered by
Story, Justice, on the 24th of February, judges being present. all . the
A writ of intrusion ivas brought by the United. States against the Defendant in error to recover pos'sesbion of an undivided part of certain land lying, within' the district of Maine. Upon the trial of the cause in the district Court of that district, a special verdict was found by the jury, upon which the same Court gave judgment in favor of the Defendant in error. This judgment wps afterwards affirmed in the Circuit Court of Massachusetts, and is now before the Supreme Court for a final decision.
By the special verdict it appears that the claim of the United States tó the. land in controversy is under on* Nathaniel Dowse, who derived his title, if any, from an instrument stated at large'in the same verdict, and executed in His favor by one John Nelson. The instrnment is 'without a seal and was executed at the Island of Grenada» in the West Indies, before a notary public, according to the mode prescribed, by the existing laws, to pass real estate in that colony — and both parties were, at that time residents therein.
By the laws of Massachusetts, no estate of freehold in land can be conveyed unless by a deed or conveyance under the hand and seal of the party — nod to perfect the title as against strangers, it is further requisite that the deed should be acknowledged before a proper magistrate, and recorded in the registry of deeds for the county where the land lies.
The question presented for consideration, is whether the lex loci contractus or the lex led. rei sitae is to govern in the disposal of real estates.
'The; Court entertain no doubt on the subject; and are clearly of opinion that the title to land can be acquired and lost only in the manner prescribed by the law of the place where such land is situate. The judgment of the Circuit Court must, therefore, he affirmed,.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (98 total)
-
Thomson v. Kyle, 39 Fla. 582 (Fla. 1897)
-
Harris & Co. Advertising, Inc. v. Republic OF Cuba, 127 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)…immune and, thus, could not have been used to establish quasi-in-rem jurisdiction and, in case plaintiff should be successful, for the satisfaction of its demand. Since the case of The Schooner Exchange v. M’Faddon, 1812, 7 Cranch 116, 11 U.S. 116, 3 L.Ed. 287, it is well settled that only governmental instrumentalities, like warships, are exempt from the jurisdiction of our courts. In holding that the suit should be dismissed, the Court stated: “One sovereign being in no respect amenable to another; and…
-
United States & Republic of Cuba v. Harris & Co. Advertising, Inc., 149 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…same was to prevent private individuals of one nation from interfering with the goods, possessions or chattels of a foreign nation in the judicial tribunals of the private citizen’s country. See: The Exchange v. McFaddon, 7 Cranch 116, 11 U.S. 116, 3 L.Ed. 287; 2 Curt. 478. The doctrine has been recognized by this court in the recent case of Harris & Company Advertising, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 687, and in the case of State ex rel. National Institute of Agrarian Reform v. Dekle,…
Previewing 3 of 98 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence